History happens at eye level

Most of the history you can name happened at a height of about five and a half feet, and the people who lived it could see only what was in front of them. An essay on the bird's-eye view as an accessory, and ground-level imagination as the only honest way back.

3 min readUpdated

TL;DR

We picture historical events from above because maps and aerial photographs are easy to find, but everyone who lived through those events stood on their own two feet and could not see beyond a few hundred metres. Napoleon at Waterloo, the witness at Lakehurst, the peasant who watched the lord's hunting party ride past, all worked from partial vision. Eye-level historical imagination is the discipline of remembering that.

Key points

  • The bird’s-eye view is recent: aerial photography starts with Nadar in 1858; mass-readable topographic maps come later still.
  • Napoleon at Waterloo could see almost none of his own battlefield, and the same was true of every general in the era.
  • The Hindenburg burned in roughly thirty-seven seconds. The eye-level event is not the same as the photograph.
  • Most people in history could not see what we see when we picture them.
  • Eye-level historical imagination is a discipline, not a feeling: commit to one viewpoint for more than a glance.

Most of the history you can name happened at a height of about five and a half feet. The people who lived it could see what they could see from there. They could not see the map. They could not see the next chapter. The narrative we now hold is the view from another building, much later.

The bird's-eye view is recent

When we picture a historical event, we picture it from above. The Battle of Hastings as a diagram of moving lines. Roman roads as red threads across a buff continent. Versailles as a parterre seen from a balloon. This is a recent way to see. Aerial photography begins with Nadar drifting over Paris in a balloon in 1858. Topographic maps that ordinary people could read are an 18th- and 19th-century invention. Before that, "above" was a divine vantage, available to angels and to rich men who paid painters to render their land as if seen from a hill.

The peasants in Bruegel's paintings are seen from above. That is the painter's eye. It is not the peasants'. Most people in history could not see what we now see when we picture them.

Napoleon couldn't see his own battle

Napoleon at Waterloo could not see most of his battlefield. The line ran for about four kilometres. Black powder smoke, hedge lines, the ridge of Mont-Saint-Jean, the woods around Hougoumont, and the rye in the fields all blocked the view. The Emperor's working knowledge of the battle came through staff officers riding back and forth at speeds the field allowed, reporting what they had been told. The same was true of his enemies. Wellington, on a smaller ridge, could see somewhat more of his own line and almost nothing of the French interior.

This was the rule, not the exception. Borodino, Austerlitz, Gettysburg. The men commanding these battles were partially blind beyond a few hundred metres. The clean coloured-arrow maps in the back of the textbook were drawn later, by people with all the survivors' reports laid out on a desk. The actual people commanding the events were running on partial vision.

Thirty-seven seconds

The Hindenburg burned from the first visible spark to the moment its frame settled on the ground at Lakehurst in about thirty-seven seconds. That is roughly the length of time it takes to read this paragraph aloud.

The iconic image of the disaster, the one your mind goes to, is the photograph. A long backlit silver airship leans into a black sky, fire climbing the tail. The photograph is the event compressed. Inside the cabin, in those thirty-seven seconds, people were trying to find the next handhold on a ladder or the next child's hand. The witness on the ground who shouted "Oh, the humanity!" produced one of the few pieces of evidence we have for what the event felt like in real time. Even that is filtered through a microphone facing the wrong way.

The eye-level Hindenburg is not the same event as the textbook Hindenburg.

Looking up

A peasant in twelfth-century England who saw the lord's hunting party ride past did not know the lord's name. The hunting party did not know the peasant's. Both were "in" the same medieval England. The history book sees one of them and infers the other.

This is what eye-level historical imagination is for. Not to overturn the textbook, which has its uses. To remember that there was always a body in that landscape, and the body could only see so far, and what it saw was almost never the part the textbook prints. When you commit to a single viewpoint for more than a glance, the period stops being a period. It becomes an afternoon. The five-and-a-half-foot view is the only one anyone ever actually had.

What we owe the missing camera

The bird's-eye view is useful. So is the map. So is the chronology. But we should remember they are accessories: late, technical, written from above. The thing itself, the moment that occurred and ended, took place at the height of someone's eyes. To imagine it from anywhere else is to imagine someone else's experience.

Sources and further reading
  • David A. Bell, The First Total War: Napoleon's Europe and the Birth of Warfare as We Know It (Houghton Mifflin, 2007). On the limits of command vision in Napoleonic battle.
  • Stephen Bann, Parallel Lines: Printmakers, Painters and Photographers in Nineteenth-Century France (Yale UP, 2001). Includes Nadar and the early aerial view.
  • Ian Mortimer, The Time Traveller's Guide to Medieval England (Bodley Head, 2008). A whole book written in the eye-level register, including peasant-and-lord sightlines.
  • Michael McCarthy, The Hindenburg Disaster: 80 Years Later (Smithsonian Air & Space, 2017). On the timeline and witness statements that the famous photograph compresses.
  • John Berger, Ways of Seeing (Penguin, 1972). On the politics of who gets to look down at whom.

Filed under

  • essays
  • memory
  • perception
  • imagination

Continue